say that sometimes you have to count to ten before speaking. I have decided to count to thirty before writing. And now, after thirty days, rewrite and soften what had been written at the time.
- And do not write anything about this in his blog.
The "whole This "referred to events of street violence that lived those days in Algeria, because I did not think the statement that accompanied this unreasonable order, stay away from work the weekend or drive registered cars green distinguishes the vehicles of diplomats, aid workers and foreigners in general, with provisional registration in Algeria.
I can not say that the phrase was exactly that, pear so I passed it as an instruction. I tried to contrast the above information before writing and asked him who sent me the phone number of the deceased. Of course, that person has not bothered to contact me, perhaps because they suspect that my answer would be something like:
- I am an adult and my freedom of expression is limited to the confidentiality required in my professional work, respect for truth and secrecy judicial. Do not quote ever in my blog for personal consideration, not because they can. But if you think you have the authority to gag, I'm afraid you're wrong. And look, it is precisely now when I go to write.
is not the first time it happens so ago. Almost three years ago a superior called me to his office to tell me his name forbidden to appear on my blog. I replied that we were at work and I was talking about a topic does not work, outside the office, where it was not my superior, but my intention was not to name the blog who do not want to appear named. Did not understand, because that summer, when I was on medical leave, I called it a day by telephone, to ask about my health, but for me that kept me from writing more on the blog, because she had written a report on Algeria, saying well what was my role and now they were all crying in panic and fear in my office because they had high risk of attack.
I note that the person in question in his mind mixing facts with a very peculiar version of reality. So, I had not written any of that on the blog. But, of course, heard this woman talking about without having read what it was.
responded that day itself that the blog was something about my private life and had no authority or right to give me instructions.
Another time was a English manager in a hotel in Algiers on that rather than to face a friend used to ask him to omit comment on the rice with shrimp heads to gold price, 40 euros, we had served in the hotel, making us believe that it would be a English meal, when then did not even qualify the kitchen to see what we were preparing.
Apart from this last story, what bothers me most is the attitude of those who do not understand what is my private life and my freedom of expression and come running to my superiors at work to say I'm a bad boy write things politically incorrect. If your goal is to intimidate me, I do not know. All they do is they see them as cowards, unable to say directly what they want. That has been the modus operandi of a few guys serving in Algiers. They have failed to shut, only to be surrounded by a halo of largemouth and conflict. Hence in this case I miss the attitude of this Mortadelo colleague, a person affable and friend who I have no reason to cause these problems. Is a person who, on three occasions, in informal talks, told me not to publish certain things in the blog. And I have always ensured that there was going to do, and never write anything on the confidentiality of my work. I guess this time did not bother to write about violence in the streets of Algeria, but on the instructions to employees of the Embassy of Spain. But why not told me directly? And if it was a joke, is aware of being creándome the same problem if I tell people be careful when talking to him, which then appears in the reports? I'm more cautious
of what some think and I do not even remotely what I can get to know. You can check that this blog did not show the name Drouk ***, for example, or comments on the struggle of a military power around the nom de guerre of Tou ***. Nor can I speculate meetings happening in France known members of the self-styled gowns *** k *** provisional government, or the sale of sahara *** *** by visa, even though one has received testimonials of people who have been in those circumstances.
If a personage so important to create a day that particular thing I did not publish, or want to know if I talked about this, that, or beyond, I say so directly, without intermediaries. Those who do not have a red passport talks educated and we know we do not eat to almost anyone.
0 comments:
Post a Comment