promised yesterday to provide a summary of what is terrorism that currently prevents the free movement of southern Algeria and the countries of the Sahara desert.
The Maghreb Al Qaeda group forms in Algeria and Algerian terrorist Salafi ideology, which arise abandon the idea of \u200b\u200bdevolved government of Algeria the Islamists to focus on a broader objective. Thus, a whole new batch of terrorists, not only in Algeria, has unfortunately found a reason for their existence in becoming a scourge of the West. The movement has spread like a stain oil depressed areas and affected neighboring countries. Spain is particularly dangerous for contamination between the Sahrawi. Despite the efforts of the leaders of the Frente Polisario, on the move as Mauritania is Saharawi nomads who have had something more than contacts with cells of Al Qaeda, making it even more so the chances of the process of independence for Western Sahara. I'm not trying to imply that support Morocco's Maghreb Al Qaeda, but its filtering between Saharawi comes very well for perpetuating the occupation of lands that do not belong.
Maghreb Al Qaeda is not a uniform group, but is led by a number of emirs, kings small Taifa, which act more or less independently and on many occasions even take wrong between them, something that is inherent to terrorism in the region. The hijacker of the English, a certain Belmojtar, was regarded as one of the less ideological and considered by the Algerian intelligence services a candidate to surrender if you provide livelihoods and return to Algeria with his family., Though perhaps not in his old job with camels. A few years ago moved away from the positions of Al Qaeda to try to live with his family in northern Mali, where is your wife. You keep good relations with the core Hard Maghreb Al Qaeda, as Drudkel, Yuadi or Abu Said, the bloodiest in the region, responsible for the murder of the French hostage and purpose of the French military attack a month ago, but has kept a more proper pirates and once it has found understanding of the terrorist leaders.
This is, broadly speaking, the situation as told by me. The intermediation of Chafia and money that has been left behind in the public domain. And try to predict what can happen from now is an exercise in fiction. On the positive side would be the possibility that it would Belmojtar satisfied with the money and leave terrorist activity. Or that his disobedience to the instructions received lead to a settling of accounts which would weaken the cells of Al Qaeda in the region. On the negative side, the money of Spain serves to continue killing and kidnapping. Or that among a people so poor easy money indeed serve as a call to be a terrorist, as has happened in other parts of the planet. Or that the apparent breach of international tacit agreement not to negotiate with terrorists to weaken further opportunities for joint action Western.
My personal opinion and I stated at the time, not make too many comments, if someone reads them back. And again expressed more forcefully in the private blog.
0 comments:
Post a Comment